The
music industry has been in a downward tailspin for the last 25 years. With the
development of social media and online streaming services, traditional music
marketing and sales techniques have plummeted. By this time, we all know just
how much these streaming services have seeped through the industry causing
havoc. But what many people don’t know is that for the first time in music
history, independent music labels are doing better than major record labels. At
this years Grammy’s “in
indie publishing, Kobalt said its songwriters Max Martin, Shellback, Ryan
Tedder worked on Swift's album of the year, also noting that another
of Kobalt's songwriter/artists, Lionel Richie,
was the recipient of a tribute, along with Skrillex taking Best Dance
Recording, among other awards” (Christman.)
This was a huge win for the independent label community because it finally
symbolized how maybe artists can have it all.
The reason these independent labels
are doing so well is because they now hold control over crucial rights that
were previously monopolized by major record labels. But now, with the Internet
and other streaming services artists are no longer in need of a corporations
funding or network. Independent
labels explain how “we used to be able to develop new talent without owning
master rights, but these days, because Internet marketing and film, TV and
advertising promotion is such an important part of development, we need to own
or administer the masters as well in order to expand the development
opportunities and ease the licensing issues,” (Kramer.) The music industry and artists are in constant
struggle over publishing and master rights. Publishing rights are given to the person who owns the
rights to the composition or the “author” of the music. The publisher must give
consent for someone to own the actual music to distribute it, which is known as
“right clearing.” Essentially they own the copyrights to the music and can
license the master rights out. Master
rights are also known as recording rights. Whoever has these rights owns the
actual recording of the song’s sound so they are entitled to royalties. These
usually belong to whoever financed the recording and they also give permission
for the recording to be used or performed. Publishing and master recording rights
are where a majority of money is earned. Since record labels used to monopolize
these rights, they were making 63% of the profit within the music industry.
Masnick, Mike. "RIAA Accounting: Why Even Major Label Musicians Rarely Make Money From Album Sales." Tech Dirt.Web. 13. Jul. 2010.
Originally major labels
offered artists resources that they otherwise wouldn’t have had access to
before. This included funding, studio time, equipment, networking, management,
marketing and a plethora of other perks. More importantly it provided artists
with a sense of stability within the industry. In return, the label would see
profits from owning the master rights since they financed it’s creation and
would have in house publishing deals that would rarely cut deals to artists. Labels
would lock artists into contracts that would require artists produce a certain
amount of albums, sell a certain amount of albums and if not you would be in
breach of these contracts thus being in debt to your label. However now it is
easier than ever with the Internet and streaming services for artists to do it
all themselves, without the help of a label. When technology advanced, artists caught on to the fact that
they could make more money by keeping the publishing rights and master rights
to their songs by making everything themselves. Everything from production and
marketing would now be 100% for the artists instead of having to split between
the departments of a label. Now the four major record labels, Sony-BMG,
Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and EMI are being forced to adjust.
Independent
labels began to become a safe place for artists who now would be able to have
creative control while also keeping their music rights. “The interesting thing
about this trend is that ownership of a label grants a publisher exclusive rights to master recordings.
This opens the floodgates for all sorts of new revenue streams and promotional
opportunities” (Kramer.) Now artists can play their music when they want, how
the want, and for how much they want. Major
artists such as Adele, Mackelmore & Ryan Lewis, Diplo are all products of
independent marketing and label deals. With “major label companies are now in a
transition period, and are struggling to come up with the end-all-be-all solution
to all of their problems,” (Ostrow.) Now major labels have sought to buy parts
of independent labels in hopes for trading percentages of publishing rights and
other access to their artists. This can be seen with Adele who is also in
partnership with Columbia Records and Universal Music Group. In return, these
major labels offer promotional funding since a majority of artist’s money is
made through touring.
With
this flux within the music industry I believe that the independent label
circuit will create finally for fair compensation to artists for their music.
They will no longer be forced to churning out singles or albums in order to
fulfill contract requirements and instead be able to bring actual musicianship
back to the music industry.
Works Cited
Chirstman, Ed.
“Grammy Scoreboard – Tallying the Major & Indie Label Wins.” Billboard. Web. 16. Feb. 2016. <http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/grammys/6875502/grammy-scoreboard-major-indie-label-wins-universal-warner-sony?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily&utm_term=daily_digest >
Kramer, Evan.
“The Publisher as a Record Label.” Music
Business Journal. Berklee
College of
Music. Web. Oct. 2010. <http://www.thembj.org/2010/10/the-publisher-as-a-record-label/>
Masnick, Mike. "RIAA Accounting: Why Even Major Label Musicians Rarely Make Money From Album Sales." Tech Dirt. Web. 13. Jul.
<2010 https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/23482610186.shtml>
<2010 https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100712/23482610186.shtml>
Ostrow,
Jonathan. “Indie vs. Major: Which Record Label Contract Is Right For You?”
Music Think Tank. Web.
10. May. 2015. < http://www.musicthinktank.com/mtt-open/indie-vs-major-which-record-label-contract-is-right-for-you.html>
Media Clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofn0b9OTyP4
“Artifact”
(2012)
Start: 2:10
End: 4:30
You raise some very good points in your post, but I have to disagree when you say that, “The music industry has been in a downward tailspin for the last 25 years.” As a matter of fact, I believe that it is flourishing and is approaching its golden age, just in an entirely evolved way. Traditional music consumption that we were born and accustomed to at a young age is without a doubt showing itself to the door. I can’t even remember the last time I purchased a CD, to be honest.
ReplyDeleteOn another note, I totally support your argument that independent labels are doing extremely well. I am an avid user of Spotify, but I also use Soundcloud, a social media hub for independent musicians and DJs. It allows them to upload and post their music right on their own profile, allowing users to stream, purchase, and sometimes download for free right from their page. You are right: these independent musicians are their own record label. Goodbye Sony, Warner Bros, and Universal. We live in an age where we no longer need you!
Like you said, record labels provided resources that made it possible to release an album: funding, studio time, equipment, networking, management, and marketing. But with the new technology around us, we ourselves can provide all of these things without a studio presence. We can buy our own equipment, download our own music recording software, build our own fanbase and network across social media platforms, and we can build our own personalized brand on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and countless other platforms. This is the ideal time to become a musician because it is the age of self-expression and self-ownership. This is why I love Soundcloud; every song I listen to is coming straight from the publisher without the presence of a record label. The material is raw and it creates a more personable listening experience, in my opinion.
A good example of a business model that follows this pattern is Tidal, a streaming service launched by rapper Jay Z. An article published by Billboard describes it as having, “a really unique set of assets. It has exclusive content, deep connection with the artists — A-list artists — live events like Tidal X, and a unique set of assets. It's early in the game, but the seeds have been planted and it creates a really fascinating foundation” (Peoples). Many people are against this type of service because certain music is limited specifically to this one platform, requiring a monthly fee for access. An example is Kanye West’s “The Life of Pablo,” released in early 2016. It’s a rather easy way to anger fans, but it’s also an easy way to make money. But most importantly, it leaves the control of music in the artist’s hands, which is so crucial in age filled with piracy.
Of course, these types of platforms begin to blur the marketplace. Writer Dan Rys of Billboard describes “The Life of Pablo” as Kanye’s “Not-Really-Released Album” (Rys), as Kanye claims that he will not be releasing his music anywhere but Tidal. This concept is rather abstract to us because it is so new and unusual to us, but it is interesting because it just may be foreshadowing for what’s to come in the future of music.
Works Cited
Peoples, Glenn. "Jay Z's Tidal Gets New CEO: Former SoundCloud Exec Takes the Streaming Reins." Billboard. 1 Dec. 2015. Web. 29 Mar. 2016.
Rys, Dan. "The Future of Pablo: What's Next for Kanye West's Not-Really-Released Album?" Billboard. 19 Feb. 2016. Web. 29 Mar. 2016.